And influence military policy.

i don't think women should be allowed in political positions if they aren't dying for the cause

That depends. If they have sons in the army and is personally invested, I think that would be okay.

which isn't guaranteed

No, it's not.

But there should be exceptions, not just a blanket ban on all women's involvement.

hey @Deleted User french or polish?

They aren't needed

therefore i don't find the exceptions needed

You don't know that.

There may be suitable times.

like when?

there's a lot of statistical evidence that women are ineffective in combat situations and lots of positive evidence suggesting that women in active combat actually increase casualties

That's true.

what can a woman do that a man can't?

however, there is also significant evidence that women are excellent intelligence operatives

@Deleted User be dishonest

Women are also good suicide bombers.

@Deleted User women are exceptional at disception

This.

i don't mean dishonest like a migtow loser

i mean it like in the espionage way

women are almost always more effective assassins

war is a complex deception, just like politics, and men and women have different yet equally necessary roles

i'd say that's due to the mans fault

it's nature bro

of being more sexually driven

It is what it is.

end of the day ur dick is going to fuck you

how many times have you gotten drunk and said fuck the rubber

i mean honestly even the most pragmatic rationalist can end up married

still shouldn't be in parliament

not to make an appeal to nature but it's nature

male figures are the epitome of strength

we need strength in leadership

okay in parliament the only people who belong there are scholars and warriors

everybody else is just some interest group's panzi

and no i dont mean ponzi

@Deleted User french or polish fam.

i'll agree with that

as long as the scholars and warriors are male