@Deleted User Only way the system's getting replaced is via destruction of the old. And as it stands it'll take revolution

I think active pragmatism is key. Even if it fails, it is a learning process, and each iteration provides an improvement on the last. Providing we maintain and update theory throughout. The next step is indeed some kind of radical transformation. But which exactly? And what comes after revolution? How is it motivated? All important questions. I guess the only way to find out is with action.

A complete failure and non-starter is infinitely more valuable as a learning experiment, than being resided to speculation and engaging with nothing at all. @Deleted User

Of course with failure comes loss and cynicism. Some kind of collective project is necessary, to keep the scientific theory objective and push forward with learning from the setbacks.

@Deleted User There requires a certain amount of skilled peoples to begin a movement. Slowly but surely we're working on it.
Also
>Egoist
Egoism is a spook

Read Mein Kampf

>Egoism is a spook
Don't worry. I am realising this. I have to defeat myself and I will.

Just like once before I defeated the religious impluse in myself, at least in a structured official capacity.

Free copy

@Deleted User Faithlessness is a deadly mistake

It's better to believe in a God than not to, to hell with Marx

The problem he recognized led to a false conclusion

Which was the control of a populace by men by exploiting their faith

Those are separate things. Marx's critique of religion following from Feuerbach is just one segment. God is a spook just like the Ego. Materialism again here killed it.

Materialism and Worldliness are one in the same

Faith has a material explanation.There is no where to hide.

If need be make your God nature

Seems arbitrary and obfuscatory. That's the opposite of the kind of pragmatic view that such a 'what works' political movement demands.

Politics and faith must not cross

I don't see the point in trying to compartmentalise and preserve something outside of something else. That's not a good representation of reality. The two are also competing goals. One is pragmatic and the other isn't. How can you rationalise faith?

This is conservative and idealistic. It holds back political understanding and progress.

Is this Fascism, to you? @Deleted User

@Deleted User We are getting into aninism territory now.

What's the difference between a right wing conservative and a facist? Because I see none

wel

@Deleted User Ooga booga

fascists usually

actually

thats a very good point tbh

i cant think of *any*

FASCISTS HAVE [system] AND BELIEVE [ideal] MAN I READ IT ON WIKIPEDIA

If it's on wikipedia it must be true!

like holodomor?

Holodomor?

What's that?

Whoa, hold on there tankie.

holohoax

Oh look a right wing asshole