Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 362840684253675522
Offence of the people.
helping the people, should be dictated by the people.
By they can't. The only thing people can dictate is themselves.
thats not my point
the people should decide what the government helps them in.
majority>minority
They can't.
People are not gods.
no
but the majority should dictate.
everyone should work to benefit the community.
not themselves.
nation>individual
Wrong. All political structures create a political class and monopoly of ideas.
not always
as long as the government is for the people
by the people
it may work.
I just told you that is impossible.
how is it impossible
it was thriving
until poor military decisions destroyed it
That's authoritarian not democratic.
In practice.
yes but it is for the community
Mind you, I think authoritarian is superior to democracy.
I agree
but
the people should elect the leader
But the people themselves do not have the ability to represent themselves on any higher level. Thus the need for enlightened authority.
the people should elect the leader out of practicality
because if not
(fucked up on edit)
violence?
Well, for me there is no leader.
But in this scenario any way is necessary.
It just so happens that democracy is the path of least resistance but not necessarily so.
but think about it.
if the people elect a leader
for a generation