Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 371428282974863360
i love volunteering
@Deleted User >only a loser would take drugs
*ring ring*
*ring ring*
Yes, hello.
"Hello, its the fifties. We head that @Deleted User stole our drug propaganda, and we would like it back"
Oh, right, I'll get right on that.
"Geez, thanks mister."
No problem, honey.
So, besides the "lul druggies are losers and alcohol is obviously different and you can never moderately use illegal drugs because the first ganja needle leads to heroin addiction", would you like to argue any of the studies or the fact that the main goal of the law you're arguing for hasn't been actualized in any way in the 100 years it has existed ?
@wizzy Well that is good for you.
you really messed up that one-liner didn't you
@Dasus Oh boy, seems like I hit a nerve.
nope
refuting what you say is not the same as being emotionally invested in it
@Deleted User I've used drugs for about 10 years, mostly weed, psychedelics or stimulants a few times a year.
I'm fine, thanks.
A lot better than most alcohol users I know.
@Dasus That is what they all say before they hit rock bottom.
@Deleted User, no you did not. Just because my answers are eloquent and amusing, it doesn't mean you are annoying me, since I'm amused by annoying you.
Your responsens lack any essence and you are still just ignoring the fact that you won't debate ANY OF THE ORIGINAL POINTS OR ANY OF THE STUDIES.
😃
nice
if you say you're good, you're actually bad
@Deleted User you are either 60 or 13
You know at which point you should accept defeat and start shaming yourself?
When a third party interferes in a public chat after a long debate. <:troll:312064734113431553>
@Dasus >Shaming myself
Sorry, I am not carl the cuck, who would lock himself in handcuffs in order to apoligise for slavery.
how is not wanted genocide cuckery
natsocs are pragmatic
@Deleted User Can you rephrase that?
@Deleted User , sorry, but I've studied this subject for a decade, and when you realize, somewhere in the future, that you were wrong, you're gonna remember this conversation, and even though you keep your cockiness now, the memory is gonna hit you like a proverbial witches arrow.
You see, I don't personally care about the time table.
I only care about the fact to me, you're as obviously wrong as a Flat Earther, denying to look at any scientific evidence and just switching the subject, that flaming you just makes it so much better, because it will make the memory so much stronger. 👌
@Dasus Here comes another 5 paragraph long post about how I am a cunt, come on, lay it on me.
you said they were cuck natsocs if they dont want genocide
@Deleted User I dare you. Answer ANY of the arguments I made.
1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance
OR any of the SEVERAL studies I linked.
I DOUBLE-DARE you.
@Dasus Oh sure, let me stroke your ego some more about how you supposidely studied a topic for 10 years but still have to resort to google.
@Deleted User do you remember every url you use from memory? I think not.
And, by definition, I did not use googles search enginge.
I used my personal history and youtube, and even if it is owned by google, that is not what you implied. Still. This is your only argument.
I repeat:
@Deleted User I dare you. Answer ANY of the arguments I made.
1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance
OR any of the SEVERAL studies I linked.
I DOUBLE-DARE you.
@Deleted User what do you use instead of google?
lol
why do you use a search engine for your info
keep trying to ignore the subject a bit longer, maybe I'll give up
its not like i've done like illegal stimulants to keep me going all night
@Dasus So you still have to use the internet for everything and cannot remember anything? Wow, really good education.
I literally wrote down the simplest form of the argument against prohibition for like 30 times.
1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance
why do you use a search engine for your info @Deleted User
why don't you go to the library
why don't you do studies yourself
@Dasus Seemed like you should have rememvered more... unless you blew it all out your ass.
Stop. Switching. The subject. You're being intellectually dishonest, and its not going to work with someone who is intellectually above you on this subject. I'm not proposing I'm more intelligent as a whole than you, but I am observing that in this instance you are acting really naively.