I can come back tomorrow for double or nothing if you aren't wallowing in shame.

>I'm pleased by publically shaming dumdums
Isn't this a private server though?

Or are you really just having a good stroke of the ego?

Privately set up, publicly hosted. Anyone with access to an internet connection can access it, anywhere in the world ,ergo, public

Maybe you should talk to chopin, he is really good at knowing how to bloat your ego.

I mean, I can keep up at this all night if you like, like I said, I did some amphetamine earlier tonight.
I don't usually do it because I'm so energetic either way, but I'm trying to see whether the notion of dopamienergic drugs calming hyperactivity is actually true.

No man, my ego is really big already. I can see you're suffering with yours, since you want to discuss about mine.

So. About the subject. Are you willing to admit to not responding to any of even the simplest points of the prohibition not working?

@Dasus >Drug addict
>Tries to defend using drugs
*Opinion discarded due to personal bias*

so now you are saying that anyone who ever uses a substance is addicted to it? So everyone who ever drinks alcohol is an an alcoholist?
Or is it just amphetamines?
You do realize that several million US kids are on amphetamine daily. Its called Ritalin.

Yet you did not label it as such, hinting that you are doing meth.

And no, the point is not even if I was addicted. That doesn't matter. However, I do mean that I rarely do this. Last time I did amphetamines was some 6-7 months ago.

Obviously even if I was a drug addict loser, it doesnt meant that my points about the prohibition don't matter.
To say that would be obviously fallacious.

So. All the points I made and the several studies I showed?
Anything to saY?

No, its not meth actually.

>uses drug

>instantly addicted

dang

@wizzy Meth, not even once.

I've tried meth, it lasts for like 1,5-2 days, I really, really dislike it. This is dextroamphetamine, which is chemically basically identical to what they serve to kids upwards of 6-years old as "medicine".

@Dasus >Even if I was a loser
Only a loser would takr them.

nice

not really an argument though

I will make sure to visit you at the soup kitchen in several years.

i love volunteering

@Deleted User >only a loser would take drugs

*ring ring*
*ring ring*
Yes, hello.
"Hello, its the fifties. We head that @Deleted User stole our drug propaganda, and we would like it back"
Oh, right, I'll get right on that.
"Geez, thanks mister."
No problem, honey.

So, besides the "lul druggies are losers and alcohol is obviously different and you can never moderately use illegal drugs because the first ganja needle leads to heroin addiction", would you like to argue any of the studies or the fact that the main goal of the law you're arguing for hasn't been actualized in any way in the 100 years it has existed ?

@wizzy Well that is good for you.

you really messed up that one-liner didn't you

@Dasus Oh boy, seems like I hit a nerve.

nope

refuting what you say is not the same as being emotionally invested in it

@Deleted User I've used drugs for about 10 years, mostly weed, psychedelics or stimulants a few times a year.
I'm fine, thanks.
A lot better than most alcohol users I know.

@Dasus That is what they all say before they hit rock bottom.

@Deleted User, no you did not. Just because my answers are eloquent and amusing, it doesn't mean you are annoying me, since I'm amused by annoying you.
Your responsens lack any essence and you are still just ignoring the fact that you won't debate ANY OF THE ORIGINAL POINTS OR ANY OF THE STUDIES.

😃

nice

if you say you're good, you're actually bad

@Deleted User you are either 60 or 13

You know at which point you should accept defeat and start shaming yourself?
When a third party interferes in a public chat after a long debate. <:troll:312064734113431553>

@Dasus >Shaming myself
Sorry, I am not carl the cuck, who would lock himself in handcuffs in order to apoligise for slavery.

how is not wanted genocide cuckery

natsocs are pragmatic

@Deleted User Can you rephrase that?

@Deleted User , sorry, but I've studied this subject for a decade, and when you realize, somewhere in the future, that you were wrong, you're gonna remember this conversation, and even though you keep your cockiness now, the memory is gonna hit you like a proverbial witches arrow.
You see, I don't personally care about the time table.
I only care about the fact to me, you're as obviously wrong as a Flat Earther, denying to look at any scientific evidence and just switching the subject, that flaming you just makes it so much better, because it will make the memory so much stronger. 👌