Sure, there could be a useby date that stated that you would have to use them by a certain date unless you get sent to a gulag for being a capitalist porko, but that would be the extent of it.

Well it's based off of how many hours you work

And things are priced based upon how many hours they took to produce

So under this system, you could actually buy back what you produce, you cannot in capitalism

Oh for fucks sake, this is almost identitical to a capitalist system.

🤔

You would get a certain amount of good boy points based off of how many hours you work, AKA a wage, and items would be priced on how long it took to produce them, AKA, how much quality (hopefully) was put into them, (If not, you could just sit on your ass all day and exploit the system and inflate prices.), so in otherwords, the company would price them based on how much effort and resources were needed to produce them, and of course, there would be a few extra good boy points needed, because otherwise there is no profit in making your items.

"company"

I don't think you know what you're talking about

Excuse me.

I mean "factory" or "workplace".

Unless we are in syndicalism, it is unlikely that companies could even form with 100% taxe rates and an incredbily short period of time to hold onto your good boy points.

But, they would still form under the name of "factories", with them just being single location based companies.

It's a centrally planned economy you nigger

@olev Oh so the state owns everything?

That certainly does not leave room for corruption or exploitation at all.

says the fascist

By the way, the state is made up of worker councils

There is worker self-management

@olev That didn't happen in every socialist country that has ever existed.

What, worker self-management?

Not in the USSR or China

Well it existed in early USSR

there's an intermediate stage between capitalism and socialism

Dictatorship of the proletariat

That and the leadership being worker councils.

Probably because they were peasant based

But anyways

>Central and eastern europe in the 1940s
>Peasant based
?

The socialist mode of production supercedes capitalism, it doesn't co-exist with it

Those were puppet states of the USSR

Yes, I already know this, we talked about it like 10 minutes ago.

(The non co-existance that is)

Well you said socialist countries

I thought you'

you're an anti-capitalist*

Unless you're just one of those

Yep, that I am.

"i hate capitalism but i dont want to replace it"

Though that does not mean I can use it to my advantage in debating against you.

If you truly supercede cpaitalism, I need to see if that is true.