Message from @Hervepärka
Discord ID: 393637059971121162
to an extent yes
Not at all
or when revisionism threatens socialism
hmmmmmmmm
After all, juche has fucked over NK as a worker's state, you cant even call it communist
juche slowly transformed into a non communist ideology
Whatever
It still proves my point
whos to blame for this the west or the kims
blame cant be given only shared
The people of north korea could be a peaceful and a true communist nation
they need to unite korea first
otherwise they will always be in danger
But those retards leading them fucked it up
I wouldnt count that even as a problem
Or better said, as the worst of problems
so in your view this is monarchism revisionism vs capitalism
The thing is: they are self sufficient, there's enough for all. The problem is that you have those maniacs holding on to their power and controlling their own people in an almost orwellian fashion
hmm how do we fix this
You even have a "loyalty" system that openly creates classes, in a society that was supposed to be classless
Making the essential shorter
its shit alright
You have people in DPRK living luxurious lives for being lap dogs and regular masses living in precarious conditions
How is this fucking fair? It is just for the kims to consolidate their power
its not
it needs to be overthrown after capitalism
or during
In the best of cases before
You cant build a house on an uneven foundation
But anyways point presented
hmmm i just dont want nukes luanching everywhere id rather show the world they are revisionist
they are false
imagine if they invaded a leninist south korea
it would completely delegitimize them
even more
Tell me, how the fuck does "monarchist revisionism" or whatever that means relate to this?
im just anlyzing north korea a it is
a system that has straighed so far from leninism it became a monarchist system
That's a crude comparison but id advise you to restrain from using those terms: it just makes you look blatantly ignorant
ok