Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 577082057977757716
lol
im just going to let you talk bnbow as you make yourself look like an idiot
asking for support
lol you are so weak
the only reason why you are a communist is because you want other ppl to pick up your low t slack
i dont want weaklings that are stupid and maligent in my community
yeah you are stupid and disruptive whilst not being able to be silent when you are wrong
i keep shiowing that you are wrong but it isnt reading with you
this makes you a reall bad worker
you demish the rest of us with your behaviour
you are bad for the collective
and this is why we need eugenics
ere, this is 2005 research, instead of your century old reverence to hear say
lol you dont even know that 100 years ago ppl were race realists
i wonder what ad iominem or slander he cxomes up with now
type faster slow poke
so you retyping
ow sure thats why the little "is typing " shows up so long
so why do you state you are eating in reply to that first line after the image
it doesnt makes sense,
unless it was your second line and the first was just more slander and ad hominem
as you havenO aRGUMENT
gENDER
gender
he flips subkect again
lol
well it isnt even loading
and i 100% bet they make the claim, "because of genetic drift and massive varriance you cant really say that x person is x race
oke that first one is just a history of termonology
doesnt really supports your point in a single way, not even if you would strech it
its like 100% not saying anything
and the second one is supporting my point 😄 so saved
Race was once thought to be a real biological kind. Today the dominant view is that objective biological races don't exist. I challenge the trend to reject the biological reality of race by arguing that cladism (a school of classification that individuates taxa by appeal to common ancestry) provides a new way to define race biologically. I also reconcile the proposed biological conception with constructivist theories about race. Most constructivists assume that biological realism and social constructivism are incompatible views about race; I argue that the two conceptions can be compatible.
i fully agree with this
the termonology is pretty screw, race biological groupig is fact
im literally talking about this 10 mins ago in international
seems like you are posting links with out reading or understing them
its funny when ppl are so dogmatic they think that anything on the subkect will prove their believes