they have

And can you reduce the social movements which deem this a wise or unwise idea to biology?

they cannot

And since it's necessary for *all human action* to be determined biologically for your argument to work, *your own actions* too?

he's a racist; it's done

anything outside of that is meaningless to him

in his head, it doesn't matter, as long as he gets his way

Again: ***at the moment that you provide proof that you're biologically determined and that your biology is what caused you to act this way, you have already done something new which can't be explained by the application of the biological models that you've used - __you've thought about all of this__.***

you know I have

Your existential crisis is a mask.

his is, yes

Indeed it is @/me#2047

I wonder if he's figured out I kept responding and has gone back to read

I want you to pull out the 'I'm here on Discord and I'm arguing against Garbage' gene. And the 'I'm here on Discord and I'm thinking about being here on Discord ann arguing against Garbage' gene too.

being a racist, he cannot accept the nature of genetic variability; he has created a mythological "ideal" - that will ultimately become a dead end

**I could demand INFINITELY MANY genes!**

***You lack any means of fundamentally providing a proof and keeping up with your subjectivity. You can never say that your actions are completely owed to your biology. And through the 'Butterfly' effect, that cascades outwards to THE WHOLE OF SOCIETY.***

we have so many we don't use already

his construct is socially created; not science

now you have him by his hairy white orbs

Biology causes environment which causes and is caused by biology. But the biology itself has changed in a way which could never have been explained before using that past biology as a model.

So there is a new kind of motion happening which cannot be said to be part of that biology.

yes. this is the nature of natural selection. survival at any cost; sometimes every cost

This new kind of motion is forever gaining control over biological processes themselves.

and he wants to be a conservative in the face of infinity and say "only my way. kill the rest (kill every first born)"

so his POV is myopic

The objects which mediate this new motion are *us as subjects*.

yes. we are the hand of change in this. all of us

not just him, as he wants

You seem to want to listen to audiobooks about all your familiar political topics. Why not get cracking with something new, something visual? Challenge yourself:

http://dialectics.info/dialectics/Welcome.html

http://dialectics.info/dialectics/Primer_files/Karl_H._Seldon_,_for_F.E.D._,_v.2.0_,_Introduction_to_%27Contra-Boolean%27_Thinking_,_21MAY2016.pdf

me? been there. you know that. I was just being back up, since he blocked me

**If you say that biology which ultimately affects itself is still the biology, then you're admitting that the definition of what biology constitutes is changing.**

**This change relates to our domain of subjectivity - the social world, the world of reasoning and thought.**

it cannot be. anything, once affected, while it is still itself, is also changed. change is the only constant

if you replace, over time, all the parts of a machine, is it still the same machine?

it is changed. it is itself

and it has survived

it occurs to me; addressing the racist: if a white man moves to the equator, over time, his offspring will react by developing darker skin. are they still white?

and since, provably, the white skin only developed after some of their ancestors, the losers who could not find food there, moved north, east and west; you are derived from the weakest of them