yeah idk about a link, if the link wasnt sourced its enough to say it

you now need to look on a case by case basis to attempt to debunk the image

"this was not sourced" aND boom you have won

>you now need to look on a case by case basis to attempt to debunk the image

Burden of proof as they say is on you.

no

or... actually i phrased it poorly too

hahaha

You posted that image we asked "well where's it come from"

theory has been made

and then you defelct and dodge

go a head and disprove it L:D

fuck if i care

burden of proof

>fuck if i care

frankly blunt for you

i never dodged anything

you do need to prove to offender that he is wrong now doom clit! :3

so you don't care just if it agrees with you

otherwise he will neve rknow he is wrong

im telling you to llok at the list and find out the case by case racial basis

then come back to me

+1 do that

On all the things you linked one says its not done by racial cases, and that chart you used does not even exist. Then you linked the fBI for some reason.

And that didn't help you either

simply go look up every mass shooting that happened that year, and record those statistics and come back here and post

>I'm telling you to do my research for me

Why are you wiggers always just the dumbest?

@(っ◔◡◔)っ ♥ doom clit ♥ i liked the fbi one because commie said

https://news.sky.com/story/why-are-white-men-more-likely-to-carry-out-mass-shootings-11252808

wiggers gonna wig

@Smokingonnazis the research is already done

Yea your source is wrong

mine is correct

Don't like it?

Do my research for me and verify it.

he's delusional

arabs are classed as whites

this is the data set your link uses

My source uses your source

amd these are the results