except you dont pay for anything

Note that I did say depending on who leads it

@WaitFor(You) Except there was currency and people paid for things.

>look at how all the state actors made a socialist country shitty

yeah

It was just because they were aiming for the war

like spain

So not at all.

if you have a dictator which is always the case in those countries

You get this but if you get a nice guy which he will die

Otherwise, having a war industry and not using it is just a complete failure

spain was on a fast track to being right, then outside actors stepped

if germany didnt get into wars and had a dictator who wanted to force out ethinic minorities

in

@WaitFor(You) Hitler himself said that national socialism is nothing like marxian socialism.

it wouldve done great

Nothing will happen because he is dead

@WaitFor(You) Wrong.

Remember jfk?

>not like marxist socialism because i say so

The one good leader died

>the idea of people doesnt live on and effect us today

okay bud

the differences end at egalitarianism

and private property

@WaitFor(You) So the civil uprising in the weimar republic funded by trotsky and lenin were examples of it being a great and prosperous nation?

other than that

not much different

Big differences

The german economic situation was better under nazi governance just because of the war industry

depends

Communism also creates food shortages in the ussr there where lines for food

HAVE YOU SEEN RUSSIA

ITS ALL DESERTY TUNDRA

Because you could not easily send food over to the capital from the farm

FOR FUCK SAKES

Parts of Russia

Many is arable

most of it

no

is desert