Nothing will happen because he is dead

@WaitFor(You) Wrong.

Remember jfk?

>not like marxist socialism because i say so

The one good leader died

>the idea of people doesnt live on and effect us today

okay bud

the differences end at egalitarianism

and private property

@WaitFor(You) So the civil uprising in the weimar republic funded by trotsky and lenin were examples of it being a great and prosperous nation?

other than that

not much different

Big differences

The german economic situation was better under nazi governance just because of the war industry

depends

Communism also creates food shortages in the ussr there where lines for food

HAVE YOU SEEN RUSSIA

ITS ALL DESERTY TUNDRA

Because you could not easily send food over to the capital from the farm

FOR FUCK SAKES

Parts of Russia

Many is arable

most of it

no

is desert

And Russia had Ukraine

A breadbasket

@Breen Western russia, while harsh in the winter is good enough to grow crops in.

theres people still starving today

and dying

in russia

@WaitFor(You) did you pass any grade?

their style of government doesnt solve their problem

although the ussr did make some pretty sustainble methods of fertilizer production compared to the west

And it's happening because of the fucking collapse

they have virtually no agricultural trade partners

thats why people starve in russia

@WaitFor(You) That was implying that the soviet style of governance was perfect.

no government is perfect

but just because it isnt

doesnt mean it doesnt work