The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions. The criticism of religion is, therefore, in embryo, the criticism of that vale of tears of which religion is the halo.

this is coming from karl marx

a dreamer

thats it

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USSR_anti-religious_campaign_(1928%E2%80%931941)

karl marx was a cuck

@Deleted User what's your political stance btw?

hopefully not communist

democratic socialist

thats okay

luxembourgist

thats also ok

Oddly enough fascists are for religion xD

of course they are

well yeah

they need it to keep the people docile

"religion is the opiate of the masses"

but that doesnt make religion bad necessarily

yeah

spirituality is perfectly fine

I don't exactly understand how you'd take money away from the wealthy without government influence.

religion's intentions is to unite people under one common belief so they can learn to have good morals

revolution

lol

that's why communism is stupid

how can you abolish something that'll keep people at least a teensie bit sane???

Are we just going to rely on individuals to take money from the wealthy?

*collective

-_- Or are we abolishing the entire concept of money?

the collective would be taking the power from the wealthy

thats cuckery

@Deleted User thats cuckery

well in communism there is no currency

so, you are willing to take wealth from an individual regardless of how he accumulated that wealth?

Communist requires a dictatorship type structure.

he couldve worked hard for that his entire life

caps block

typical

anyways

well, effectively all capitalists get their wealth from exploitation

*some