Saying "small price for freedom" over an issue that is entirely not a small price, nor for freedom, isnt a rebuttal lol.

Having freedom of self-defence is ok with me.

But thats not what you have.

I think we should take guns away from people who propose to take guns from us.

You're propping up property rights, fatal attacks, and for what?

For freedom of self-defence.

Are you not a communist btw?

I suppose the property rights bit wont matter if you arent a communist

Communists are pro-guns

Yes, but they arent stupid

And believe in absolutes

Some are

Well yes obviously some people believe in the absolute unfettered right of man to kill one another

But thats probably cause they're shit

But what I mean to say is

An overabundance in firearms in the US directly benefits the capitalism system at this time

Everybody must have guns to support revolution.

Except the dont

And didnt

In every country thats had a revolution

It wasnt because they were given guns

Under rights

They took them

They raided military stocks

They stole police equipment

They acquired illegal weapons

They didnt stock up on weapons decades earlier to the point where they had mass shootings every other week

@Comrade Skeltal I'm pretty sure bolsheviks armed workers first before raiding.

Yes, with illegal arms...

Legal

They werent somehow gaurunteed under the state as they are now

They werent registered

Or tracked

Or recorded via background checl

Guns were not restricted in Russian Empire

It is entirely not the same

Yes

But the russia empire didnt have the means

To mass produce them

And shoot them into

The public at large