he wasnt like

100% correct

Tito was a silly goose

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqGyiHB38pE

death to the state

oh piss off

you are the reason franco came to power in spain

Haha

no, you are, your camp disarmed the anarchists

if you hadnt insisted that you must focus on ideology while fighting a war then perhaps you wouldnt be deemed a threat sitting all alone in catalonia with a bunch of guns not doing anything

theres a *w a r*

like the one rojava is fighting?

rojava has no place in syria alongside those that want to destabalize the region however you are taking away from the point

the anarchist did not want to help win the civil war

and therefore the left as a whole lsot

lost*

"hay que derrocar la reacción"
so that meant nothing?

How did they not want to help win the civil war? There were Anarchists that actively fought the Carlists and Francoists

That statement seems absurd

becauses of the anarchist communes that would not send out forces but would insist that the socialist and communist and MLs change their theory

there were anarchist fighting

but the movement as a whole pales in comparison to what the others did

because of the fact they couldnt fathom fighting with the "Stalinist monsters"

goddamn tankies YOU'RE the reason socialism is constantly discredited

whats your point

you havent justified not fighting fascists

brb teas ready ill be back in a few

we would win more hearts if not for tankies

Do you have sources for those claims

where is your source that the anarchists didn't fight the francoists?

none?
how typical of the red bureaucratic liars

okay

I dont have sources just lined up

but look up the POUM

it came to mind with Orwell

who we all know is real good pals with Stalin

uh-huh, so his support for the fai meant nothing as well

I read Homage to Catalonia and I honestly do not recall him talking about Anarchists fighting amongst themselves

Anarchist fought the republican movement

The republican movement was seizing the radio stations

yes