and no Im not licking their boots

criminals are

they are anarchists

so of course they'd be violent

so nobody has the right to protest then

great

@alines Sure is a good reason if you ask me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pE3z9sa9Kdc

Nobody has the right to violently protest no

Protest is okay though so long as they dont attack people

good thing police aren't people

Except they are

idiot

not if you say communists aren't people

"People who risk their lives for innocent people aren't people" smh you're honestly a disgrace

Who the fuck said communists arent people?

they are

they're really dumb people

@alines Communists technically do not have rights.

Two birds one stone

Im out

in this context, "everyone to the left of me is le communist"

@alines But much of the anti drumpfkin protestors actually were communists.

or anarchists

antifa are known commies

anyway again, peace

there was a split since the french revolution

@alines Anarchists are inherently communists.

Marx wasn't present during the french revolution, therefore meaning that the worker strikes were not socialist or marxist in their nature, which is what communism and anarchism is.

uh-huh.
just keep jumping to these absurd conclusions without actually analyzing the actual beliefs of anarchists and communists

@alines What? In marx's definition of communism, the state is dissolved in the end, which is what anarchists want.....

anarchists and communists have actually grown to hate each other quite a lot

Do you not know anything about marx?

we don't want the dictatorship of the proletariat, we don't want a transition, destroy the state now while you still can

@alines I bet that will turn out great, look at how pol pot and the ukranians turned out, they had to use authority to actually go to anarchism, and the efforts completely failed and left mllions dead.

pol pot was not an anarchist, you retard

And with guevera, his people actually turned on him, handed him to authorities, who then riddled him with bullets.

and by that logic, pinochet and montt were socialists because le military dictatorships = socialism lol

@alines No, he very much was, after all, why did he put so much effort into supporting it?

@alines Did I ever claim that dictatorships were inherently socialist? Or was it >LE IMPLIED?

where did you even hear that pol pot was an anarchist?
and the ukrainian anarchists were crushed by the soviets, idiot