I already provided you with some, and the ultimate conclusion we arrive at, is that pol pot supported the anarchists in campodia, and provided aid to them, which ultimately resulted in the anarchists merging with the communists, and fighting for the same government, (ironic I know).

a web article saying he used anarchist lines to win support?

more than that

PROOF that he contacted the anarchists and provided them with aid

PROOF that there even was an anarchist party in cambodia at the time

that would only proove he didn't attack the anarchists, mind you, not that he was a closeted anarchist

If he DIDN'T provide support to the anarchists, then why were anarchists commonly in the government, and why did they fight side by side, even up until the guriella movement fell in the 80's?

give me ONE name

just one

Communist party of kampuchea, AKA the communist and anarchist party.

i have never heard that anywhere else

Well you just heard it now.

give me one name for an "anarchist" incumbent

Chompsky actually supported them.

chomsky has nothing to do with it.
provide me with one name of any anarchists in the cambodian government

this is getting dumb.
all your evidence is merely circumstancial, i need concrete proof of your claims

Waiting a minute.....

Baukin was involved in the beliefs of the khemer rouge heavily.....

proof of influential anarchists in cambodia, proof that pol pot contacted them, proof that he provided them seats in the cambodian govt.
so far you have provided nothing to that effect

And baukin was also an anarchist.....

bakunin was dead before pol pot came into this world, are you retarded?

Which means that the khemer rouge actually supported anarchism itself, due to the actual beliefs of the khemer rouge being a merger of baukanism and chinese style communism.

where did you get that?

An anarchist forum which was discussing pol pot and their beliefs, let me find it again....

https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads/141574-Pol-Pot-and-Bakuinism

the general direction of that discussion is that the "parallels" between pol pot and bakunin are simply platitudinous and superficial, that pol pot adhered to ML, as did mao, despite mao's anarchist background. i'm looking for evidence about policy, not talking points.
influence from bakunin does not mean he embraced bakunin

he seemed to be more influenced by nationalism than anarchism

wooow

interesting stuff

Hello guys I just joined this server

welcome

Anyone have a recommended reading liat

not me but im 100% sure most others will

Ok

what's liat?

list

@UrsineWItcher https://mltheory.wordpress.com/2017/06/11/marxist-leninist-theory/

@UrsineWItcher https://theredphoenixapl.org/theoretical-journal/

Tganks

rate me

Stop