yes it did
they were literal blacks they picked up in africa
tbh those blacks most likely in his army because he needed more manpower than them joining for the ideology those natsocs will say
ww2 germany
that article that mentions lewontin's fallacy literally admits there's more genetic variation within groups than there is between grouos
not ww1 e
Germany had nambia cameroon and tanzania
in africa
tfw you have no idea wtf lewontins fallacy was referring to
the metric of genetic differences he used has no obvious relevance to subspecies
black nazis
nvm
they werent nazi coins
they were 1920s
best explanation i could find is that hitler was an asspie and would change his mind a lot.
You don't understand genes or fst distance
Natsocs will post pics of Africans serving in the Nazi Army and be like “Blacks can be nazis too”
they could be
they can
but thats irrelevant
There is more genetic variation in groups than between groups
Nazi racial ideology considered muslims aryan
there is a site called black nazis. which is dedicated to what it implies.
well muslim isnt a race
>religions are aryan
only persians and other IRANIC ethnicities are aryan
cheristian and muslims also ahted jews back then well more then today
fucking germanic savages stop stealing our cultures
it connected them
yeah but the pics they post are most likely africans who are picked up from colonies than actual blacks joining the ideology due to believing in it
@Monolith This false
Also if you base racial differences off of the smallest discrepancys there should be hundreds of races, not just the 5 you make up
Meet the Skanderburg Division. Hitler's muslim warriors
Yeah had a site that now got yeeted on that, Hitler was at least smart on using colonial subjjects against their masters.
Fst value of 6.3% does not mean races are the same
its how he got the arabs too to side with him
he posed himself as some smasher of the anglos
so some of them defected to him
>average balkan*gger
No one is making races on the smallst discrepencies
