you are lying again

What?

https://census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2002/demo/POP-twps0056.pdf

What's this?

I posted it before.

You must be illiterate.

Page 19 if I am counting up right.

Its a document of 199 pages

Yes.

you didnt source it

Page 19.

I told you.

there you go

now you finally sourced it

(1861400+11891143)/122775046*100

Black plus hispanic was my 11%

I did say.

So, back to my other point, some hispanics are listed as white.

Yeah, prove it.

Don't just show an image.

which is why teh wiki includes 2 more sources

Show the source of the image.

which is why teh wiki includes 2 more sources

Which page is this?

Send the wikipage.

There's multiple race wikis.

You genuinely are autistic.

Images aren't links.

The classification of white was differnt and and strickter then it is today

Yes so that'd mean the 89% was more accurate than 90%.

They are It is the source you fucking nigger

You just proved my point.

But that isn't the source.

That's an image of the sources.

No i dindt prove your point

Images aren't links. Images aren't links. Images aren't links. Images aren't links.
Images aren't links. Images aren't links. Images aren't links. Images aren't links.
Images aren't links. Images aren't links. Images aren't links. Images aren't links.
Images aren't links. Images aren't links. Images aren't links. Images aren't links.

Images aren't links. Images aren't links. Images aren't links. Images aren't links.
Images aren't links. Images aren't links. Images aren't links. Images aren't links.
Images aren't links. Images aren't links. Images aren't links. Images aren't links.
Images aren't links. Images aren't links. Images aren't links. Images aren't links.

You did.

"***The classification of white was differnt and and strickter then it is today***"