No.
links arent sources
It's a screenshot of the link to your proof.
Yes.
Give me the link so I can see the source.
Please.
Stop hiding it.
the definition source lies broader then hust links
Why won't you prove your points?
Give actual proof.
You are just looking like a retard with this.
Still you have not been able to llok up wiki census race
there are multiple
I said it before
Why can't you give your specific citation?
Uhhh... dze... bluhh...
Look
here is the thing
You can't prove it?
you are spamming link link link, saying that a image is not a link, when the image is the evidence and source
firther more
im right you are wrong
Show the original reference
give me the link to your citation
please
screenshots aren't proof of much.
You have yet to show that you are making any points
you did the whole math thing on which i rebutted
You aren't even giving proof.
the clasification of today is differnt
Give the link, what are you hiding?
You are just proving it isn't 90%
to which you screemed images are not links
YES.
They aren't.
Give the links.
Why hide the proof?
How many times have I got to say this?
I said that that even if anything you said had any base, you are arguing about the rounding of of numbers
This is what you ahev been so butthurt about all this time
