a screenshot of a secondhand source means nothing though

You said it was 11% with out a citation

Why am I providing evidence for your own proof?

after which i disproved your claim

I did.

by my own sourced information

I showed a citation

You haven't.

Wait I get it.

It's opposite day.

that i reverenced to and posted source of

it is just not in a easy link so dumbfucks like you are lost

I'm just wasting my time when you are just obviously trying to troll me.

You even tried a "you mad bro"

Of course no human can be this retarded.

Well, I'm going to go play some video games.

I rebut that citaion offyours

i said that the classification of hispanic changed in prensent time

listing many as white

Present isn't the past

you pulled a strawmen and added the hispanic population with the black opne

oh yeah opposite day

I forgot.

when i stated several time that hispanics are classed as whit e

In modern times.

Past and present isn't the same.

You should know this.

i provided the source on which this destinction of data in the grapphs i posted was made

What source?

Give actual proof

You then went on sperging more about images not being links

citation

actually please

give a citation

you are the one sperging

you are defending something which isn't there.

Actually do something or I won't continue this debate.

U already posted the citations several time

But because its a image you cant habdle the truth

You are as hopeless as the average North Korean's sex life.

Wait, they still have higher marriage rates than you would ever have any.