Message from @Monolith

Discord ID: 598778928601104394


2019-07-11 07:31:24 UTC  

proof?

2019-07-11 07:31:28 UTC  

I didn't say that

2019-07-11 07:31:29 UTC  

Don't strawman

2019-07-11 07:31:57 UTC  

then who owns them, what are the peoole with special relations to them

2019-07-11 07:32:04 UTC  

```>when it's doing the exact *same thing* as Capitalists were b4 but with nationalization and worker representation```

2019-07-11 07:32:15 UTC  

the state itself does not constitute a class

2019-07-11 07:32:19 UTC  

The state planners were, actually. The soviet government did this

2019-07-11 07:32:20 UTC  

dude

2019-07-11 07:32:24 UTC  

I literally just explained

2019-07-11 07:32:30 UTC  

you can destroy a wealth class of owners

2019-07-11 07:32:33 UTC  

>the planners are capitalists

2019-07-11 07:32:39 UTC  

Strawmanning hard asf

2019-07-11 07:32:51 UTC  

>took the place of capitalists

2019-07-11 07:33:03 UTC  

and if the state still MAINTAINS their position, nothing has changed except you've nationalized

2019-07-11 07:33:06 UTC  

No, they directed the economy

2019-07-11 07:33:20 UTC  

Was Fascist Italy Socialist? The Social Republic loved nationalizing

2019-07-11 07:33:22 UTC  

You have not shown how planners can be a class

2019-07-11 07:33:23 UTC  

must be socialism

2019-07-11 07:33:24 UTC  

I'm bored and lonely

2019-07-11 07:33:29 UTC  

I didn't call planners a class

2019-07-11 07:33:41 UTC  

But you literally did

2019-07-11 07:33:51 UTC  

"The state planners were, actually. The soviet government did this"

2019-07-11 07:33:52 UTC  

They did not *directly own* by legal terms, but they collectively did the same thing. Claiming it was representing.

Directing an economy =/= Socialism

2019-07-11 07:33:59 UTC  

Imagine taking context out

2019-07-11 07:34:17 UTC  

Organization is *one* part of it and I have given more than enough evidence

2019-07-11 07:34:19 UTC  

Where is yours?

2019-07-11 07:34:28 UTC  

>implying i said directing the economy equals socialism

2019-07-11 07:34:34 UTC  

Bruh

2019-07-11 07:34:40 UTC  

then you just admitted you're wrong

2019-07-11 07:34:45 UTC  

because that's unironically all it was

2019-07-11 07:34:51 UTC  

I didnt retard

2019-07-11 07:35:04 UTC  

*state planning is socialism btw*

2019-07-11 07:35:09 UTC  

>implying the workers did not own the means of production

2019-07-11 07:35:23 UTC  

So workers just ran the nation cooperatively? REALLY?

2019-07-11 07:35:26 UTC  

who did? there was only workers

2019-07-11 07:35:48 UTC  

there was no capitalists in disguise like you clearly imply

2019-07-11 07:35:50 UTC  

>inb4 soviet state didn't exist
>when 5 year plans were the workers as a whole

2019-07-11 07:36:10 UTC  

I didn't argue in disguise. I didn't argue publicly.

They weren't Capitalist, clearly. But that doesn't make them Socialist

2019-07-11 07:36:41 UTC  

>implying the state was not ran by workers

2019-07-11 07:36:56 UTC  

if you wanna argue semantics, go ahead. But that's useless as a conversation. If you don't like the fact that what I posted quite literally explains there must be a change from exchange production than use, then keep coping

2019-07-11 07:37:18 UTC  

>stalin was a worker
>chairmans and central committee was all just a bunch of factory niggas