Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 609838050993766401
what are you basing that on
If that is a factor, it's because it's not socially accepted
They have to attend school etc.
read the study dumb bitch
lol you haven't even read it
I doubt you can read
i did read it
LOL
firstly, it backs up the first point i made
they die more often
it also shows that they are smaller, and less healthy
they're more likely overall to die
and the mothers have serious side-effects which negatively impact both their health and the health of the child
so shut the HELL up you pseudo-scientific weeun rapist
There literally isn't any data/graphs in that overview of stats from the 60s
there's a lot of data, just none in pictoral form
are you one of those that need things drawn in crayon for you to understand?
No there is no actual figures
In Perinatal Mortality they don't list one figure
this is practially useless
the study is oriented around 'more likely' and other similar comparisons
and they draw incredibly strong trends between the mother being a teenager and negative side affects on the child
Show me some actual figures mr.scientist
and they provide very thorough analyses for each of those comparisons and trends
'actual figures'
trends are figures
no they aren't, they are just generalizations
just because they're not laid out in a convenient 'this much exactly' format doesn't mean it's not statistics
no, not generalisations, trends, there is a scientific difference
I want to see the numbers you dumb nigger
except these says enough
LOL
nobody gives a damn what you want to see
these trends are incredibly well-supported
nice "proof"
sad
there's a strong and obvious trend between teenage mothers and shit quality of life for the child among other things, and just because it isn't in the format you find most convenient doesn't make it invalid
@Cúchulainn you should really ignore the guy, he can probably continue for hours.
@Deleted User true, but, so can i. the point isn't to win the argument so much as to just humiliate him