Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 609842378920165386
The nature of evolution dictates that the past is inferior to the present.
that was a good thing tbf
Because that how evolution operates you retard
who wants sickly babies to survive
Adaptation improves over time.
I hope you have some retard child you have to take care of because you knock up some old roastie
The babies weren't necessarily sickly
@Deleted User we in fact want sickly babies to survive, so we develop our immunological system.
Humans have increased the age of pregnancy over time because it is safer for both mother and child that way, and every study posted here has verified that fact.
they are. if they die as a neonate, they weren't fit to srvive
Attempting to change what evolution has produced as an adaptation to satisfy your sickening desire to impregnate 15 year old girls is more opposed to nature than any position anyone else has taken here.
I'm not changing anything. I am merely not buying your liberal abstract dogma
Higher survivability rates is a significant part of what Darwinian evolution aims for.
Evolution raised the normal age of pregnancy
no, your abstractions did
if it truly did, age of pubescence would be going up
Except higher pregnancy age is shown to be better for both mother and child
not down
No, that's a non sequitur
Age of pubescence goes down over time to increase the amount of time a woman may reproduce
the absolute hubris
Nature disagrees with you retard
You're telling a PAGAN what nature does
a retard pagan tbf
My life is dedicated to nature, and this stupid bitch is telling me that lolicon means nature says he can fuck 15 year olds
'Survival of the fittest' on an individualist level is completely absent from all conceptions of Darwinian evolution.
Girls are experiencing early puberty because of phytoestrogens from soy and other plant-based foods and birth control in the water supply.
I could agree with that
Sister Nassie and der Ewige hot take
But "nature" certainly isn't selecting for old roastie mothers
20 year old isn't a roastie you daft cunt
yuck, thats like a grandma
>20 year is a grandma
No, it isn't
Hello there
Because pubescence beginning at 12 and giving birth to a child cannot have a child capable of reproduction by the time the mother is 20
So no, it's not a grandma, nor even close
Women should be marrying around the age of 16 - 19, as they did before the feminist bullshit came along.
I'm just fucking with you autist
Paedophile vs autist