Oh Kal overruled. turns out you're right, don't do it again.

https://tenor.com/view/theres-a-god-watching-over-us-alex-boye-american-prophet-song-god-take-care-of-us-jesus-mind-us-gif-19563882

contact kal about it

Iso isn't in charge of everything, as much fun as it'd be for the meme police

thank goodness those got taken down

i'm talking to kal about it yeah. rule 6 is iffy judgement so it's usually require 2-3 mods to talk it out (unless it's real obvious porn)

i dont even understand what the issue was....

<:E_:769328574032379945>

i don't see an issue with it. but, double check your memes for any mention of the word loli/citations to a loli website.

that, or because the characters look like children and kal warned you for it

Bruh... citation to a website...

im not a creep.... what is the kal guy on about

the word "loli" isnt allowed in a meme?

i dont even remember mentioning it....

there was a situation where some "rule 6-y" memes includes links to porn website

mine wasn't

do you remember if you post ‘two giant balls in loli mouth’ meme?

one of them was literally a cropped image of hentai. it was suggestive and even if it wasn't explicitly rule 6, it did technically include "vulgarity" and rule six also includes "We will protect our underage community members zealously"

So whether it was explicit or not, it implied a topic that is harmful to our younger members

something like that..? but it was a meme... they were meet balls lol... it didnt even look like a child or anything weird

also don't argue with our mods please. they work hard to make an enjoyable experience for us and fighting them is a really stupid idea

i didn't see the meme, so i don't know. was it the one with red circles?

Vulture noises

hello clemens

it did describe a sexual act though?

i can dm u

sure

the red circles was circling a womans clothing taken off and implying she was nude

Hallo, let's continue the conversation in gen2

Since it has nothing to do with the conversation at hand

thanks

the original meme was posted yesterday and it still stands (from what i know)

again: implicit is allowed.

okay I was clarifying which one it was, but I understand

where is the line between Implying and describing sexual acts?

though "describing sexual acts" isn't, so somethings it's hard to tell between the 2 haha

exactly

are you gonna talk about it @Grape

or are you dumping in the WRONG CHANNEL

then move it to cursed memes or somewhere appropriate please. read the pinned message

>:(

👀