Message from @ThiccSpicyGenderRevealParty
Discord ID: 811686211411640351
He kinda does.
@Zilla Sherman did far more than destroy people's livelihoods. Georgia was home to the Confederacy's transportation hubs like Atlanta and Savannah, so he absolutely destroyed far more than just plantations and random businesses. It was total war and definitely did lead to the eventual collapse of the Confederacy.
Was what he did controversial at best? For sure. But to say it didn't lead to an earlier surrender is a bit ignorant.
in a way he sort of won without fighting
He did fight
There were casualties on both sides.
um
uh
he did __less__ fighting
Aperently this is false.
How is completely false then?
first black democrat senator was in the 90s
and “independent fact checkers” don’t understand that Senators are not the only Congressmen
Two words - **Straw man**. "During an attack, divert attention by focusing on a minor *but related* issue." It's a quote from class material at my liberal high school, on the topic of fallacies. This motte-and-bailey sort of approach is pathetic
How a volcanic eruption in the 6th century led to the final death of the western Roman Empire, and created the ideal conditions for the rise of Islam
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JBdedLx-GI
hey quick question is jap a slur
no
its just the short of japanese
ok
because i may have just been suspended from school
People definitely take it as a slur
it was used as one during WW2
It has everything to do with politics. Every general who wins wars does so by brutal actions. It's just that the ones with political office get to paper over their history by giving press reporters 800$ steak dinners.
For more on this, watch Richard David Hanson's defense of Patton. He lays out numerous generals in his opening statements who were unfairly mischaracterized by the media smear merchants for greed.
The Media in the South took the low-hanging fruit. They knew everyone in the South hated Sherman, so they lied and defamed him so that Southerners would buy their product. They didn't want the truth, they wanted money.
Just because the Media is going after somebody you hate does not make them inherently correct.
The fact checkers are no longer fact checkers but liars for hire.
Why what happened
She asked what was Pearl Harbor so I said it was an attack done by the japs just to try and keep it short and I have a meeting with the principal tonight
who?
a teacher?
lmao
yeah
Just let him know that you understand how hard it must be to put up with all the teachers unions and the beaurucratic paperwork, and that it's a great coping mechanism to hammer a kid for not being politically correct in an attempt to verify their self-worth.
Actually I just had the meeting with the principal and she couldn’t defend her position so she went after something else and plus I am home school through K 12
I love it.
Well, I mean, I don't love that you got pulled aside for some horsecrap. Not what I was getting at, sorry.
yeah i got that
Really, for jap wow, because once i got into an argument on if the germans were really the aggressors in ww1, and my teacher was so offended she gave me a referral lol, yet in the next month, a guy wore all red, with a ushanka, and had a commie flag as a cape and he was "showing a political opinion" so Retarded