Message from @TheWorldController
Discord ID: 808114606227849237
Oh the ENTIRE scientific community? what about that one dentist who disagrees with the other 9? Did he attent the vote?
He's referring to @Mercy
Oh didnt realize I was going against the big brains in here.
HE LEFT!
@ZSLiby Studios oh u lurking too?
Just got on
Tell you what peak. How about you take your hypocrasy and shove it into your black hole theory? You cant scoff at how someone says the world began if you cant even pose your own superior theory.
Did he actually leave?
Yep
Click on him, it says he's idle
Did that coward post a big long shpeal and not my follow up, but my joke about 1 our of 9 dentists sent him packing?
Same
Man this took about 4 hrs
But semi entertainment ngl
I guess I will go brush my teeth or something. I didnt expect that to be the nail in the coffin that made him run.
OH he back
Oh wait he bringing the big guns
Because.
Thats what a bitch does.
I've got "Armies of Heaven" right in front of me, if someone makes a moral argument about the crusades, I have a feeling someone will.
No Mercy, youβre taking your claim, and your belief in god, and youβre working backwards, trying to find very specific evidence here. Science will best you every time simply because it leaves itself open to new theories based on observation.
"Like OMG, okay. Like your idea is like, so dumb. There is like No way that this will work. M'kay."
"whats your idea?"
"Like I dont have one but yours is like dumb."
How much of science is theory?
Says the person who won't leave it
Oh yeah, it leaves that big ol black hole theory flaw wide open so it can take all kinds of big new theorys in. Science can take it all!
After the theory was revised.\
You know the difference between you an me?
You like phones? Those are VERY scientific
"but revisionism is bad π’ "
even in SCIENCE
if they don't get it right the first time, it's all a hoax!
chill
chill out
Well, that's a very subjective opinion
Bold claim for someone who had to get something spelled out to them less then an hour later
The point is that the evidence and observations came first. We keep theories in as placeholders during various cases but the expectation is that they will soon be disproven or supported with evidence. Even the most wild theory in science still needs a basic observation to be credible. Religious texts make wild claims without any evidence and expect their worshippers to believe it all at face value without criticism or revision
π© pseud
Hold on
@TheWorldController you suffer one fatal flaw
Revising a theory or adapting it in the slightest is a sign of fraud and weakness. Only religion, which has never been revised, can be true