Message from @MrFusion
Discord ID: 815425979320500234
Peter allegedly being the first Pope is how catholics interpret that, the could be referring Peters confession that Jesus is Lord, not necessarily Peter himself, or even all of the apostles, seeing that they were the first generation of Christians
Jesus said to build my Church on this rock
How can you interpret historical events
If you can show me something to disprove my claims, please do, I would like to look into it
you are interpreting the rock to be Peter
He said build a church
Did he not?
Please, I would like an article
Something to disprove history
believers are the church
So, why do you take that one quote as not literal
Every other one you take at it’s face value
huh? what do you mean?
so Peter was literal rock?
So this quote doesn’t mean what it means, but when God says anything else, it must be completely what it says
You guys do this all the time
It's doesn't that peter is the pope
Kinda does
So
that's a lie, in history there have been 3 popes at the same time, at least once.
What time, and it’s still unbroken, I don’t believe any time has passed without a Pope
I thought the Pope didn’t matter to you, so why are we discussing it?
The Roman Catholic church has been corrupted by the world, most of your popes have been corrupt.
I did mention corruption in the Church in my essay, but you act if any other religion is perfect
I understand the corruption, but we have to fix it, like Jesus does for us
James the brother of Jesus was a more prominent leader of the early church than peter was.
So you admit Peter started the Church
Im not reading that entire paper. Im not paid to be a teacher.
no
You mention the early church
So
Christ started the church
Anyway, that’s fine, you don’t have to read it, I guess I win tonight
I meant the church in the general sense
not the rcc
I guess, but Peter did lead the early church
the early church had many leaders