Message from @ElCalafate
Discord ID: 812539581882564628
U just made my slightly jump, as I sat on the table
Pog
Among sus?
Why did I stop talking here
Amogus
OMG BUT YOU ARE DELETED OMG YOUR SUS YOU VENTED OMG ๐ฑ
๐ฑ
its just a user name
Am I the only one who hates the word sus?
Thatโs kinda sus <:troll_face:726878856585281557>
```Please be sure to read the announcements. There are rules there that must be followed. Do not impersonate the bot.```
ty dyno old chap
Ahhh.....Serenity in here.
serenity now!
What is that a reference to?
seinfeld
I missed that episode.
I didn't manage to watch a whole lot of Seinfeld, we always watched Simpsons, maybe some family guy in the later years (back when it was funny).
it's gone downhill
King of the Hill, which my mom hated, because it reminded her too much of George Bush.
Yeah, true.
Calafate, did you play Diablo II at all, did you find that enjoyable?
nah I never played it.. was it good?
I saw it was getting remastered
damn
they got got me good
๐
what a well written response to my argument
(responding to Elcalafate) It was good. Reason for it, if you liked old Blizzard then there was a manga I was going to shoot you a link to. Good way to kill time.
these people don't seem to like any good news
always doom and gloom
Well, I can't really comment on what you're saying, Butler, because I can't see any context for it.
Like, I have no idea what the argument was about.
the fact that we can look to the future for cures to diseases
the entire thing couldn't fit my screenshot
And what were they arguing? Like, that we wouldn't be able to cure diseases?
that some diseases could never be cured and we should stop hoping for cures
I can see a point to where they're coming from, but it's a facet of a wider argument.
Like, there will always be tragedy, I can see an argument for that. But why shouldn't we hope for cures to diseases? Well, I can only say that it seems like they've taken what I call "The Anti-human" approach.
spot on bro
People want to be objective about the experience of life, but you don't really get to be an objective observer on whether or not the human experience is good or bad. Because you're not detatched from it, you're not an observer. You're a participant.
So it largely depends on the approach you take to things. You can say "I am a human, and I believe that the human experience is good." And if you honestly believe that, then you will act as if that is the case. That's what I call the "Pro-human" argument that seems to be outlined in many religions like Christianity, Bhuddism, Zen, and others.
But then there's the argument that the Human Experience sucks, and that life is inherently unjust and not worth living. That's what many religions regard to as "Evil."