Hell, even in "anarchism" the majority has more power of the minority

But I am going to have rules and no democracy

They shouldn't be coercing others though

In the grand scheme of things "shouldn't " means nothing

Democracy over anything might disrespect someone's rights

Better than the alternative

Democracy aint great but its the best we've got

That's where the problem is

To an extent, Scorafent is right.

Its the best option

Ancap society

Guess wut

Anarchism still needs democracy

It will be small minarchies

No it doesn't

Like ancapistan

Will be full of minarchies anyways

Because of the security contracts and etc.

So then how are the big decisions made?

We are all indivisuals

There is nothing "big" to decide on

U get that?

Sadly it doesn't work like that

Prove me

If you are going to just say stuff supporting the status quo, I have no reason to listen

When you say minarchism you are referring to a night watchman state yes?

But it will most likely be voluntary

And community borders will be ambiguous

In a nigh watchman state, there are still laws yes?

No such country shall form unless someone decides to create their state out of their own land

Because there needs to be a general rule of what is right and wrong

Such as : murder bad

Yes

We have the NAP

Ok

Listen man

But who decides what is included?

Hi

For example

Can we talk about this like after

We actually try this