it wasn't close to fascism though

as it used marxist principles from what i remember

https://youtu.be/eCkyWBPaTC8 here's a vid, it's pretty much true but it does not get close to true socialism either way

it was a very off variation of it

the economical structure was somewhere in the middle and the political was far right

i honestly agree that it wasn't capitalism but it wasn't pure socialism either way

as socialism doesn't drain countless resources as fast, the economics were weird overall

No not really, he was socialist because socialism basically means in its most broad term the best for the people (Government wise). It is very similar to populism in its broad form. So Hitler was a National Socialist meaning he was for his (Nationality) people, but he was ceartinly not a socialist in Marxism terms or workers owning the means of production (You could techincally say the worker does own the Means of Production in Nazi Germany that being the Aryan Worker)

In back then sense he was a socialist but not now considering todays defention of socialism is limited to mostly marxist socialism

But even then he isnt a lefty socialist, he was a national socialist which is a big difference

how the fuck is it marxist socialism

do people even consider studying the economics nowadays

well he privatized some of the factories, simply because he needed resources. Although most factories would stay in the hands of the goverment

he simply would privatize the factories for the war effort

if the war would've ended he would've put them in the hands of the goverment again

it was a very well managed economy although for some odd reason its structure would lead to extreme need for resources

it was basically draining them quickly

people call it the "vampire economy"

well im not an expert of economics but i heard that in went to shit cause it was reliant on war aparently

yeah

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxwidjWJxAc&t=280s

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/guu-debate-politics-shop/id1295147058

hi commies ber

bad

I agree but those privatizations were really monopolies handled by the government similar to China today

true

I just watched that video earlier

It was interesting

The video does talk about his policies being aligned with socialism and the only difference with him and Stalin was kind of just nationalism and racism against non-aryans

property was illegal aswell

i mean the economics were kind of different although both were variations of socialism

hey would anybody like to write a critique of trot propagnda

anarchism is mental illness

especially anarcho communism

it only would cause civil unrest and place for crime

it would pretty much turn into chaos

sex work only will give you stds

can break

go to venezuela then

the state has almost no control there now

then i dont know, either way there would be a big chance you would get killed in the first day of abolishing the state