Off course Hitler had to do thing to an extent that people liked but to act as if he represented the interest of his people is pretty childish.

He did

Hitler killed his on people and got his nation destroyed.

>jews n niggers

>his own people

German Jews

ya thats not his people

Hitler killed ppl outside of the germanic ingroup

ffs just vc

and again, he didnt want to lose the war lmfao

Hitler killed Germans if they held political views or engaged in behavior he personally disliked.

VC time?

okay
literally every political system

General?

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/790276520022769664/802386414708457492/image0.gif

If germans had political views HITLER disliked, then they were CRINGE VIEWS, thus making these individuals a threat to germany's happiness

please don´t use happiness as a political term, you´ll make urself sound like a utilitarian

I think the ultimate threat to German happiness is genocide and murderous war.

Of their enemies?

For the most part at least.

no its the other way round

Depends what enemies

Enemies they had no real chance of beating yes

Not to mention I oppose genocide regardless of who it is done too as it hurts people.

Which is bad by the way.

Cringe view

I know

Valuing human life and wellbeing is very cringe

Yeah

Considering there's no "human" identity that supersedes national identity

I think that valuing human life and well being is an very important thing.

I think that the best political ideas try to improve society and life for a large number of people as opposed to just the population of one nation state.

why?

Funny how as soon as this was applied, society became a cesspool of miserable people slaving away for scraps and killing themselves out of despair

It truly is interesting how people react when you take meaning away from reality

You mean the meaning of obsessing over some nation state

How about you try to better things for humanity as a whole rather than just your people?

humanity is a fiction

Ok

You did it

Libs owned