Message from @grete
Discord ID: 807110337399881780
They lsot because craxy tribalists remain
hahaha no
We need to give up on tribalism
i know you dont know history before 1914 but just use ur imagination of what happens when a group fails to mobilise together against a group that is unified
You people say "we never will". Perhaps we could if you would just let go.
actually we were flying very high before idiots like you started gaining traction
Who is "we". As in nationalists?
anglo-saxon civilisation as a whole
because nationalism didnt exist prior to 1914. it was the default position
Nationalism was the default position?
its stunning to me how little you know
a fascinating case of the victorian education system
I know
I am just clarifying your view
The fact that nationalism was once the default and is now more questioned shows us that its impact can be minimized.
no are tribes are just larger
yeah i already have conceded the fact that groups can lose their ingroup preference, what you leave out is that the results in the death of the group
Wrong
Yes
It can lead to the death of the group
But that is because tribalists still exist
because of people like you, and its not real, they have empathy for the CONCEPT of of those people
holy fuck
u r trolling idc
How?
roundabout wanker
I honeslty arent trolling.
I said "wrong and yes" as I was replying to an earlier point.
ok if youre being honest tell me to what extent you know history before 1900
hint: i already know what the answer is so be truthful
I like history but am not a historian
Your point is?
So yes I am not at the moment an expert on that age of history.
sped
ok
they are not obviosuly bad
you made that up
no its worse than that