Message from @fuck12moredeadcops

Discord ID: 814299021669040168


2021-02-25 00:43:12 UTC  

@fuck12moredeadcops care to redpill us on what this is?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/793519133177675800/814296406336077874/unknown.png

2021-02-25 00:43:23 UTC  

I date an artist

2021-02-25 00:43:33 UTC  

It's a character from a comic they're working on

2021-02-25 00:44:28 UTC  

I am going to make a very simple point literally anybody over the age of 14 should be able to engage with, I just want to make sure you're familiar with the language I'm going to use.

2021-02-25 00:44:43 UTC  

Because I know you people don't read

2021-02-25 00:44:47 UTC  

And that's okay.

2021-02-25 00:44:50 UTC  

Most people don't have time to.

2021-02-25 00:47:01 UTC  

I'm guessing your point is: Firms in capitalism want to make money, if you're not a socialist you'll allow some kind of capitalism (objective above all is to make money) to exist and grow, pee pee poo poo paragraph of marxist theory world salad, and then the aforementioned "capitalist" country will destroy itself.

2021-02-25 00:47:15 UTC  

No.

2021-02-25 00:47:26 UTC  

But at least you know what a firm is.

2021-02-25 00:47:43 UTC  

Ok then explain your point

2021-02-25 00:47:48 UTC  

firmly grasping my dick

2021-02-25 00:47:51 UTC  

*disk

2021-02-25 00:48:02 UTC  

putting halo ce in the xbox <:troll:795676641450917888>

2021-02-25 00:49:26 UTC  

A firm has to generate profit in order to justify the initial investment and continued investment, and it's in the best interest of the firm owner to maximize profits. One easy way to do this is to improve productivity, but these things are finite, and you're going to achieve an opptimizied level of productivity until you change something about the system?

2021-02-25 00:49:36 UTC  

Agree or disagree? @Punished Nazberg

2021-02-25 00:49:45 UTC  

What's your point

2021-02-25 00:50:42 UTC  

Is your point that " if you're maintaining commodity production and the profit motive, globalization is inevitable"?

2021-02-25 00:50:53 UTC  

I am proving this point right now

2021-02-25 00:52:32 UTC  

That no matter how protectionist or command economy a state is, it's doomed to globalisation?

2021-02-25 00:53:35 UTC  

It'll either globalize or economically stagnate and become irrelevant.

2021-02-25 00:54:13 UTC  

The best you can hope for with that type of macroeconomic strategy is to become North Korea

2021-02-25 00:54:40 UTC  

And if that's fine for you for your country and your people, that's a great thing to advocate

2021-02-25 00:54:47 UTC  

If you're not braindead it doesn't make any sense.

2021-02-25 00:55:13 UTC  

Is China outsourcing its labour to the rest of the world?

2021-02-25 00:55:17 UTC  

Yes

2021-02-25 00:55:30 UTC  

Are you kidding me

2021-02-25 00:55:32 UTC  

They outsource to Africa because they're reaching productive optimization in China

2021-02-25 00:55:35 UTC  

They literally are.

2021-02-25 00:56:15 UTC  

Again

2021-02-25 00:56:19 UTC  

Most western firms who invest in china aren't even allowed to move their assets out of china

2021-02-25 00:56:19 UTC  

I know you people don't read

2021-02-25 00:56:34 UTC  

But it's been a subject of discussion in economics academia for the pat like 5 years

2021-02-25 00:56:42 UTC  

Okay and?

2021-02-25 00:56:51 UTC  

What does that have to do with our discussion?

2021-02-25 00:57:04 UTC  

Globalization is inevitability if you maintain commodity production and the profit motive

2021-02-25 00:57:06 UTC  

it's not a prime sign of a globalised economy

2021-02-25 00:57:26 UTC  

It is indicative of the point I'm making about the outsourcing of labor

2021-02-25 00:57:39 UTC  

Which I thought we understood to be a part of globalization in this discussion

2021-02-25 00:58:26 UTC  

They've achieved a certain level of optimization in regards to domestic labor exploitation, so Chinese capital is having to change something within the system to maintain growth.