Message from @FLanon

Discord ID: 414497424669671424


2018-02-17 19:00:07 UTC  

It's called DEFENSE, so it should be used for that purpose, not world police or growing heroin

2018-02-17 19:00:15 UTC  

"communist" nah

2018-02-17 19:00:17 UTC  

but some industries in the US should be supported

2018-02-17 19:00:35 UTC  

There's good regulation and bad regulation in my opinion.

2018-02-17 19:00:48 UTC  

I would say more than just keeping out of foreign countries

2018-02-17 19:00:55 UTC  

Stop sending money to the UN and other european countries

2018-02-17 19:01:59 UTC  

Good regulations include keeping corps from putting xenoestrogens in the consumption chain, bad regulations include the requirements to be an accredited investors and unnecessary licensing for small business

2018-02-17 19:02:32 UTC  

i think tarriffs and import quotas on foreign vehicles is fine in some cases

2018-02-17 19:02:43 UTC  

the us auto industrys health is good for the country

2018-02-17 19:02:55 UTC  

we need to protect that sector

2018-02-17 19:03:09 UTC  

I think as for the defense, definitely send the UN to some other globalist country like Canada, and NATO is irrelevant after the cold war.

2018-02-17 19:03:27 UTC  

rent control is a socialist practice

2018-02-17 19:03:33 UTC  

and only increases rent prices

2018-02-17 19:03:51 UTC  

price floors for US agriculture is commie practice too

2018-02-17 19:03:57 UTC  

but thats good for national security

2018-02-17 19:04:02 UTC  

As for protectionism, I support it to make keeping business in the US more cost-effective for business

2018-02-17 19:04:03 UTC  

also we're like the largest exporter of food

2018-02-17 19:04:32 UTC  

well the most cost effective solution would be to outsource labor in third world countries

2018-02-17 19:04:35 UTC  

I'm a bit interested in neo-merchantilism for our trade model.

2018-02-17 19:04:40 UTC  

lower wages is the most cost effective method

2018-02-17 19:04:47 UTC  

Not if we raise tariffs

2018-02-17 19:04:49 UTC  

mercantilism is socialist policy

2018-02-17 19:04:55 UTC  

that means government controls trade

2018-02-17 19:05:01 UTC  

fully to balance the trade budget

2018-02-17 19:05:10 UTC  

which we are not balanced at the moment since we import more than we export

2018-02-17 19:05:28 UTC  

thats juist more government control though

2018-02-17 19:05:45 UTC  

I think we've got to pick and choose what we do

2018-02-17 19:06:36 UTC  

well under that model we surrender more fiscal and monetary policies to the government

2018-02-17 19:06:38 UTC  

which i am against

2018-02-17 19:06:45 UTC  

i am against printing more money to solve trade balance

2018-02-17 19:06:49 UTC  

increasing money supply is no good

2018-02-17 19:07:07 UTC  

however allowing the government to invest in domestic businesses is a good fiscal policy

2018-02-17 19:07:20 UTC  

I do want to have a solution to the trade deficit

2018-02-17 19:07:47 UTC  

To make it more cost-effective to have business in the US and exporting and the such

2018-02-17 19:07:53 UTC  

see yeah it would be nice to have a positive trade balance. we do need to improve certain sectors in the united states

2018-02-17 19:08:15 UTC  

but with countries like china and now india making cheap ass products it becomes too easy to import from them

2018-02-17 19:08:21 UTC  

modern day slavery is good for almost everyone

2018-02-17 19:08:28 UTC  

I'm a nationalist and populist more than I'm a pure capitalist

2018-02-17 19:08:50 UTC  

yeah id side with more laissez faire policies

2018-02-17 19:08:57 UTC  

but do understand some regulations are required

2018-02-17 19:09:07 UTC  

but yeah i would also call myself a nationalism