Message from @indio007
Discord ID: 640570182955171853
AAP is funded by merck
see they do what is called advocacy research and that is tainted lol
“People just don’t do it,” Wharton School professor and forecasting expert J. Scott Armstrong told Brietbart.com after making the shocking claim that less that one percent of papers published in scientific journals follow the scientific method
According to Armstrong, “the goal of objectivity is one that is sought but seldom achieved because the bias of the researcher is always present. [One researcher, Mitroff] concluded that scientists [become] famous not by being objective, but by being advocates. This appears to be true. Advocacy is a good strategy for career advancement. However, I believe that it is bad advice for making scientific contributions.”
“What’s happening now is, government research, universities — they’re asking for what I call advocacy research. They have something, they want you to prove it, make sure you prove it, [and when] you do, you keep getting paid,” he said in a separate article on Breitbart.com.
“Advocacy research is the bulk of these 99 percent of non-scientific studies and they’re not done for scientific development, they’re done to support a political idea. If you want to make money in universities these days, you publish papers that support global warming and you live handsomely.”
same with the vaccine industry
all about money
“Truth” has a price tag
This is such a fascinating idea to consider; particularly as the base motivation for these “scientists” appear to be more focused on capitalism rather than accuracy. Armstrong argued that being politically convenient is more rewarding both financially and in terms of one’s career.
“[Scientists] cheat. If you don’t get statistically significant results, then you throw out variables, add variables, [and] eventually you get what you want,” he concluded.
Scientists are human. Scientists have a vested interest in promoting their work, often for status and further research funding, although sometimes for direct financial gain. This can lead to selective reporting of results and occasionally, exaggeration. Peer review is not infallible: journal editors might favour positive findings and newsworthiness. Multiple, independent sources of evidence and replication are much more convincing
So your source that is funded by merck is not a valid source of info and is more likely tainted to push a agenda
@Sloan Jask let me know when you produce a good source
lol and seems you dont like the sources that go against the government sources that we know lie
Give your body an extra strength detox down to the cellular level with Pure Body Extra Strength, the world’s first colloidal zeolite created using with breakthrough sound wave technology. This is a type of zeolites that help with the removal of heavy metal toxins in your body and it seems to be helping kids with autism too
this is what happens when you go against the big pharma narrative which has ppl who lobby these politicians the help get them into office for favors
i dont think you understand how the system actually works
or you do and your one of the shills
I never had the measels but im pretty sure ive been vaccinated for them as a kid.
Lol
I must be protected =)
My brother had measles , so I was exposed. I just never caught them
Or maybe I'm dead.
😄
U r naturally immune cuz u washed your hands
My brother must be dead to.
i got the measles, mumps and chicken pox and it didnt kill me and i NEVER need their vaccines or a booster shot and i will never get those diseases again
Dang u r lucky
😄
HAHA
didnt kill any of my friends either
lol
It's a miracle!
So wretch ist promoting is own products and speak Bad about the big pharmacy. The pharmacy products helps. Your product has the Same Power as water
my products hahahaha
shows how little you know about zeolites
Yes promoting clean water and indoor plumbing. What a nut job
SO guess what sinosx. Plecebo is more effective than most pharmaceuticals and it has no side effects