Message from @Say
Discord ID: 643223323412791306
Only first
ahk
Explain this please
@Say are you trying to say that just because one's life may not be compromised, that it's not harm? Like isn't, as you said, paralysis a form of harm?
That's why I specified life threatening
Or else, we should be crying over a flu
Running the **incredibly** low risk of paralysis is better than not being vaccinated and contracting a disease
@Say so, your position is.....is that it's OK!to harm people as long as you don't kill!them?
This guy.
o-o
No, there’s a risk/reward associated with this
You give them something that would prevent them from something worse
@Say well, that really didn't answer the question. Is it OK to harm people as long as you don't kill them?
You run the **incredibly** low risk of being temporarily paralyzed (more than 1 in 10,000,000) and you dont die from the flu or mumps or measles
I dont think you understand how deadly these diseases are
More people died from the flu in the ww2 era than from the holocaust and war combined
@Say well the last half of that sentence could be argued, but that's not the point. I'm trying to clear up your position about harm. So, could you please answer the question with clarity.....is it OK to harm people as long as you don't kill them?
It’s okay to run the **incredibly** low risk of harming someone if it means you prevent them from contracting the flu, mumps, measles, rubella, etc.
Sort of like Russian roulette?
But with a gun with a really large cartridge?
Sort of like Russian roulette except there’s 100,000,000 slots and only one of those is filled with a nerf bullet
Nerf bullet? Can a nerf bullet kill? Because you DID say that vaccines can kill, right?
Sure, but we don’t usually give vaccines to those people
How do you know?
Because I’m a doctor
You don’t give vaccines to people with bad immune systems
Do doctors usually say something then immediately modify their answers when prodded?
It’s called nuance
Sounds like moving the goals posts to me,.
Ik you don’t like that i wont answer your questions with a yes or no, but reality is usually shades of gray, not black and white
Aren't people with bad immune systems precisely the people who need to be protected with vaccines?
Arent people with strong immune systems capable of fighting off diseases? Or, does every disease have a 100% kill rate?
Vaccines are usually made up of a weakened or dead form of the virus. Our body then creates antibodies to fight off the disease. Even people with strong immune systems are worse off than people with antibodies for a disease
People with a bad immune system have a greater chance of not forming antibodies to the weakened form of the disease
So, does every disease have a 100% kill rate?
No..?
So, it's possible for people to survive an infection without being vaccinated?
I mean....people survived infections before vaccinations, right?