😂

Receipt not valid

Try again

@lapizzle there's something holding that .000001 pressure area. the vacuum would've taken earth as a whole in part of its system. take a coke can and what happens when you open?

of course there is a force holding it thats why there is a gradient

that gradient is gravity correct?

its caused by gravityh

you have all the explanation but in reality when you need proof there's none. can you demonstrate it working?

make an open system work within a vacuum due to gravity then your claims will have merit

if you can't, it's just a baseless claim

just like most gravity arguments

again you missed the point

it is very easy to show a pressure differential without a container

within a vacuum?

you arent understanding what im saying pressure next to a vacuum is the same as any other pressure differential

what? no it isn't lol, you can't have a focused pressurized system within a vacuum but a pressurized system in itself can have a pressure defferential (i never denied that)

8-7=1=1-0

?

you're legit doing a strawman phallacy right now, i never denied that a pressure gradient can't exist. what im denying is pressurized system even as low as 0.0000001 pressure area cant exist within a vacuum.

that is incorrect if there is a force being applied to it

that force is gravity, demonstrate your baseless claim

replicate it

so hold on a minute

it's not possible because its pseudoscience

lets break down where we agree and disagree

1) is there some force that pulls things towards the ground

so you're gonna do a red herring and argue what pulls us to the ground lol?

do u agree or nah

stay on the subject please don't switch lol

im not going to argue what pulls us to ground, it can be electromagnetism or anything, truth is idk but gravity is just as fallaceous as the density argument

but do you agree that there is some f orce

it can easily be debunked

no i dont know

could be ua, i don't believe in it but i also dont know

well you understand that force is just accelerating mass

so by definition there is a force?

are you arguing for ua?

ua can also be debunked as it doesn't solve the acceleration problem

im asking you if you understand that there is by definition a downwards force

>there is by definition a downwards force
any proof?