Message from @RadRhys

Discord ID: 641307524951310371


2019-11-05 16:01:59 UTC  

For example, density being the primary factor of falling objects has been refuted.

2019-11-05 16:02:13 UTC  

Gravity is a theory the rest are guesses

2019-11-05 16:02:30 UTC  

Gravity is an assumption based on assumptions

2019-11-05 16:02:49 UTC  

Its an assumption based on observable evidence

2019-11-05 16:03:23 UTC  

@PhoenixAshes can you refute ua or magnetism? magnetism attracts thing and ua mimics the gravitational constant. saying that because there is no opposition to your argument so it must be true is fallaceous as fuck

2019-11-05 16:03:51 UTC  

Gravity is the force that anything with a mass has

2019-11-05 16:03:57 UTC  

@AbašŸ„€ Gravity is a lot more than that I already told you

2019-11-05 16:04:04 UTC  

Any two things with mass do gravity stuff

2019-11-05 16:05:04 UTC  

Magnetism only affects ferrous materials. What happens when you drop a block of wood?

2019-11-05 16:05:19 UTC  

Gravity is a theory, a theory is a claim that has been supported by evidence and cant be proven wrong, theres a reason its a theory and not a hypothesis or a tumbler post by a crack head

2019-11-05 16:05:20 UTC  

And I thought UA was FES stuff?

2019-11-05 16:05:28 UTC  

@Emperor Crap define ā€œstuffā€ lol

2019-11-05 16:05:48 UTC  

Well they attract

2019-11-05 16:05:50 UTC  

"Gravity is a theory" Good job <:cool:507986727953235970>

2019-11-05 16:05:59 UTC  

Thanks

2019-11-05 16:06:16 UTC  

Worked hard on that

2019-11-05 16:06:20 UTC  

Anything in the universe

2019-11-05 16:06:21 UTC  

Hours of research lmao

2019-11-05 16:06:41 UTC  

Just drop a pen ffs

2019-11-05 16:07:05 UTC  

Independent and dependent variable

Gravity: šŸ˜° šŸ’¦

2019-11-05 16:07:08 UTC  

A theory can be proven wrong, Aba

2019-11-05 16:07:09 UTC  

@PhoenixAshes What about ua? Im just using it for argumentation sake that anything can work like gravity in a different form. My main point was that you said there's no contrary evidence that is consistent like gravity is therefore it's evidence is a big argument from ignorance fallacy.

2019-11-05 16:07:39 UTC  

Do you even know what a dependent variable and independent variable is?

2019-11-05 16:08:03 UTC  

Upwards acceleration fundamental flaw is that it is not really acceleration, which refers to a change in velocity. So you add 9.8 m/s ever second.

2019-11-05 16:08:37 UTC  

@AbašŸ„€ I sure do

2019-11-05 16:08:51 UTC  

Then please explain how gravity doesnt have one?

2019-11-05 16:08:52 UTC  

Gravity has a lot of careful experimentation that goes further than simply the reasoning for why things fall down. For example, in GR gravity wells cause time dilation, which has been tested numerous times starting with the Hafeleā€“Keating experiment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafele%E2%80%93Keating_experiment

2019-11-05 16:09:37 UTC  

The link doesnt work

2019-11-05 16:09:39 UTC  

I remember that one

2019-11-05 16:09:54 UTC  

@AbašŸ„€ really? works ok for me...

2019-11-05 16:10:13 UTC  

ā€œBad title
The requested page title contains unsupported characters: "%E2".

Return to Main Page.ā€

2019-11-05 16:10:23 UTC  

Works for me

2019-11-05 16:10:38 UTC  

Odd

2019-11-05 16:10:40 UTC  

Try another browser

2019-11-05 16:10:42 UTC  

hmm, wiki the Hafeleā€“Keating experiment

2019-11-05 16:12:21 UTC  

That should work

2019-11-05 16:12:25 UTC  

It says its a test of the theory of relativity

2019-11-05 16:12:32 UTC  

Yeah i found it thanks

2019-11-05 16:12:33 UTC  

Essentially yeah

2019-11-05 16:12:49 UTC  

What is the theory of relativity exactly btw