Message from @Metallica
Discord ID: 641307102610063391
What other theory would work as well as gravity
@PhoenixAshes that might be true but it's not evidence
Iāve heard a lot of electric universe theories but you would literally be ripped apart atom by atom if that were the case
I already told you a few but they have their own flaws @Abaš„
In the end we got no idea
If you are able to eliminate potential variables, then yes it is evidence.
Sorry, ātheoriesā*
And that's the honest truth
Gravity has never been proven wrong and theres stacks of evidence supporting the main idea of it
For example, density being the primary factor of falling objects has been refuted.
Gravity is a theory the rest are guesses
Gravity is an assumption based on assumptions
Its an assumption based on observable evidence
@PhoenixAshes can you refute ua or magnetism? magnetism attracts thing and ua mimics the gravitational constant. saying that because there is no opposition to your argument so it must be true is fallaceous as fuck
Gravity is the force that anything with a mass has
@Abaš„ Gravity is a lot more than that I already told you
Any two things with mass do gravity stuff
Magnetism only affects ferrous materials. What happens when you drop a block of wood?
Gravity is a theory, a theory is a claim that has been supported by evidence and cant be proven wrong, theres a reason its a theory and not a hypothesis or a tumbler post by a crack head
And I thought UA was FES stuff?
Well they attract
"Gravity is a theory" Good job <:cool:507986727953235970>
Thanks
Worked hard on that
Anything in the universe
Hours of research lmao
Just drop a pen ffs
Independent and dependent variable
Gravity: š° š¦
A theory can be proven wrong, Aba
@PhoenixAshes What about ua? Im just using it for argumentation sake that anything can work like gravity in a different form. My main point was that you said there's no contrary evidence that is consistent like gravity is therefore it's evidence is a big argument from ignorance fallacy.
Do you even know what a dependent variable and independent variable is?
Upwards acceleration fundamental flaw is that it is not really acceleration, which refers to a change in velocity. So you add 9.8 m/s ever second.
@Abaš„ I sure do
Then please explain how gravity doesnt have one?
Gravity has a lot of careful experimentation that goes further than simply the reasoning for why things fall down. For example, in GR gravity wells cause time dilation, which has been tested numerous times starting with the HafeleāKeating experiment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafele%E2%80%93Keating_experiment
The link doesnt work
I remember that one
@Abaš„ really? works ok for me...
āBad title
The requested page title contains unsupported characters: "%E2".
Return to Main Page.ā
Works for me