Cause if you do you will realize your claim is false

good point

my claim isn't false, if you're seeing curvature through a glass window of an aircraft, that right there is the proof. there is no curve

r u serious

im too tired for this

but the curve of a window is negligible, meaning that images can still be taken as true and accurate, like @catman said

Fredward that isn't the effect

and that's only one piece of observation evidence

sorry

i meant the distortion

*i think that's correct*

The curve is the same on both sides

The change of angle is constant

Meaning no distortion like you speak of

Think of water in a glass, the glass is curved. If you look at a straw in the water through the glass the straw is still straight

Or it is larger

right

yeah

Meaning that the glass causes a linear transformation to the image

i'm not a flat earther

Not a nonlinear one like you suggest

i've just never studied this

i was just making a wrong assumption based off of what you said

Physics is hard

It's usually in intuitive

i know

it was just that specific aspect

thanks

@CryptoCypher

ironically enough, that's one of the arguments i used earlier

What's your counter

there isn't one, really

for him

trying to verify your claims right now, seeing as you haven't substantiated it

You’re the one who claimed the glass curves the image, you have the burden of proof

first off, even if you don't look at the arguments that were just presented, observable evidence shows that the glass of a plane doesn't distort the image

just look outside the window

on a plane

it's a bit of a crude argument, but it works

well, whilst I try to verify @catman claim, I'll either prove he's right and debunk myself, or I'll prove him wrong and verify my claim, won't I @RadRhys ?

yes, but the burden of proof means that as the presented of an argument, you have to back up your claim with proof