There isn't much of a difference between the two

They claim that the constellations change based on the rotation of the earth which if there isn't a rotation it would be false

What's to say that the constellations don't "rotate"?

Hello?

NVM wasn't loading

Oh

Not the constillations rotating

The north sky and South sky are different

Why and how

You keep saying that dude

I just explained to you why that question is null

No you didnt

Everything has an answer

Calling a question null isn't an answer

It's a deferal

You are a further distance from the North constellations

And can only see southern

The luminaries are much closer than you are told

How close

Can you give me numbers

Are they closer than the sun?

Dude

I know you're used to all of the "answers" being given to you

But the truth is that all of those "answers" are just assumptions and flat earth doesn't do that

How are they assumptions

And I've calculate d a few for my self

The distance to the sun for example

Okay

Do you know what the mainstream model says about that?

How is it an assumption

It uses math

But can it be proven in reality?

Yes

Math doesn't always line up with reality

Through indirect measurement

Math is a tool

You can't measure the sun to the earth

Physics is how you can use those toools

What can I measure

Hmm?

I can measure the height of a building indirectly and be accurate