Surely thats the first thing you check.

You cant make a claim without proof, and telling someone to watch YT isnt proof

nathan oakley has more credibility around here then chris hadfield. this a different realm

go pick some roles @Edward

Just dont refute what I said then

nice dodge

are you talking to me ? @Edward

tbh, anyone

click my name and read the tags

im not a FE

Well, ur not going to believe this stuff then

**Question Of The Day #234**

Do vaccines spread disease more than they prevent them?

Please react in <#547645432604393482> and/or make your comments in the <#484514023698726912> 😃

what ? @Edward

I didnt say anything confusing

My question was targetted at anyone who believes this stuff

Why are people believing this stuff without evidence?

because

What evidence? saying there is evidence isnt evidence

its a really long answer

I have time

I have no life

kool

okay

so

Its a holiday in the UK

I got time

what holiday ?

the word "evidence" doesnt necessarily mean the same thing to the usual FE as it does to us @Edward

Clearly

right, so why use those words

Because it's tje right word

The

LOOOL

Evidence should be needed for any claim in politics or science

well yeah

*evidence*