What do you mean exploration and funding @IXI

like how do you expect a working flat earth model if people dont know what is down in antartica and some places in the artic

and you would need to spend some money in research to figure things out

Well I mean I’d like to see the model just present an accurate sun and moon

Because the current sun and moon above the plane model doesn’t present anything correctly

But I understand it’s essentially a sketch

first we figure out our earth and then lets think about the sun and moon

Well I mean

ya i get you

but its not important

Amateur people can see sunspots and calculate the trigonometry to the sun

But I understand that’s not what flat earth is about

I’m sure flat earthers don’t disagree with all the science around the sun

thats why the distance from the sun has changed dozens of times throughout history

Well that’s true

But it’s less of a change

not really

And more of using better technology to get better information

in some cases pretty significant

only recently the changes became small

Right

Because the technology is far better

but the basic trigonometry you talk about has been used a long time ago

and the changes are massive

That’s true

That’s how we got the first estimes

Estimates

if you actually want an accurate one you would atleast want to know the size of the sun

But science claims to have that information

they can claim all they want

they have no proof

Well of course

They have evidence

nope

i dont believe the sun is 400 times further and larger than the moon

they look similiar and close to me

idc what math nasa did

my eyes wont be deceived again

http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/about-us/41-our-solar-system/the-earth/orbit/87-how-do-you-measure-the-distance-between-earth-and-the-sun-intermediate

If you don’t care about contrary evidence then you’re not really a rational person, would you agree?

‘my eyes won’t be deceived again’ sounds like you don’t care whatever evidence contrary to your position the future holds