Nobody goes to the south pole because it doesn't exist. It's an imaginary point in the snow that they claim is the south pole
it is such a stupid idea if you think about it, restricting an enormous piece of land from the people
ron plz just repeat with ur words what i proposed
@IXI i just proposed a test to show what they claim is flase did you understand what i mean?
by sailing around southpole
why are you so concerned about the sun's shape ? @Luncean
im just asking you
sure im all for different tests
What do you think about the sun's shape
could you explain to me how my test is supposed to show it @IXI
https://i.postimg.cc/dt6Q3F0s/gifanime-2018-01-21-18-12-37.gif
i just wanna see if u understand
well if it was flat then it would point to the same direction
no
if it was round it would move
nope
it could point in different directions if you move around the south pole
that wouldnt work it would still point same in both
well thats what i got
the sun and the moon are 2 dimensional circular in shape , in accordance with our observations @Luncean
since it would according to ron only point north it would move same on both models
Captain Cook traveled 60,000 miles around Antarctica in the same direction and NEVER found an outlet?? It should only be 11,000 miles in circumference
So it's round
its the circe radius
on ge the radius of circle around southpole is much smaller than on fe
The compass points to the center of the circle
A compass must be held LEVEL to function. It would not even work on a globe
round is circular, yes Luncean, , you have a long way to go if you weren't aware of even that
ahahahaha youre such a smart white boy
meaning on round earth the distance you travel to surround southpole is far less than on fe
A circle is NOT a sphere @Luncean
same with distance from one end of australia to other end etc
on fe there longer than on ge
not necessarily.. regular grade 3 pupils are already aware of this information no need to be extra smart
i never said its a sphere
On a globe Antarctica is the small end of a ball @negatic
yes thats what i just explained ron
60000 miles doesn't make sense on a globe
More than twice the equator
It works perfectly on a flat Earth
i dont trust that number same as you dont trust nasa
