Message from @negatic
Discord ID: 646814319249457172
3km is small area i guess
but how tall is that person Ron?
Over 120 km with no curvature
yes i heard your argument for we can see further than we should ron its the best argument fe has i know
LEVEL water is the best argument.. because 70% of the Earth is covered in water
nah water is level *0
Hi Ron *0
hey spot
Hi spoton
hi neg
u did some new videos?
only of atmospheric conditions
i see
You have eyes but you cannot see @negatic
January was my clearest month last year
@Ronsheckelson you are smart but you do not understand
yea i remember fog on your videos
how is seeing further & further the best argument FE has if you don't think that the argument stands and is easily debunkable on a globe earth model? @negatic
1:05 in the video
https://youtu.be/1eXADyPrOM0 @negatic
@carlito its the best argument precisely because its not easy to see how this can be on ge but if you look deeper into everything you come to the conclusion that despite this it must still be a globe
guys i found a really old scroll here in vatican where it clearly says the earth is flat omg
i have to go 😦
Wanna see it ?
cya
yes please
somehow im feeling a little distrust
I cant post a picturr
ron if u add &t=XXX you thereby add startposition to a yt video
No curvature on the land or the water
There should be over 7 miles of curvature across the state of Michigan to conform with a globe
ron this is all 1 argument and i already said its a good one
i need permission to send pics
its in fact the ebst fe argument there is according to my knowledge
NO curvature means NO GLOBE
not directly
u see no curvature
doesnt mean ther eis none
Find me one place on the earth with this curvature rate
u equate not seeing curve with ther eis none