Message from @negatic

Discord ID: 647135407783542784


2019-11-21 18:01:55 UTC  

u work for nasa?

2019-11-21 18:01:56 UTC  

xD

2019-11-21 18:02:12 UTC  

I haven’t seen any evidence for a soul, but I’d love if you could provide some @Chrono Triggered

2019-11-21 18:02:20 UTC  

No I was just kidding lol

2019-11-21 18:02:40 UTC  

souls make no sense since there is stuff like alzheimers and changing personalities etc

2019-11-21 18:03:07 UTC  

Evidence? How about your own mortality for starters?

2019-11-21 18:03:13 UTC  

at least together with any kind of reward/punishment for souls

2019-11-21 18:03:19 UTC  

tahts no evidence

2019-11-21 18:03:25 UTC  

morality is easy explained

2019-11-21 18:03:32 UTC  

My own mortality is evidence for a soul?

2019-11-21 18:03:37 UTC  

dogs cats hamster mice have it too btw

2019-11-21 18:03:45 UTC  

all social animals do

2019-11-21 18:03:46 UTC  

Morality is subjective

2019-11-21 18:03:48 UTC  

Change my mind

2019-11-21 18:03:57 UTC  

it is subjective

2019-11-21 18:04:10 UTC  

I disagree

2019-11-21 18:04:17 UTC  

Why?

2019-11-21 18:04:29 UTC  

only with set tennants u can build an objective morality but the tenants are themselves subjective

2019-11-21 18:04:33 UTC  

I think morality is objective but my definition of objective may be different than yours

2019-11-21 18:04:52 UTC  

Morality is objective, but it is built upon subjective values

2019-11-21 18:05:04 UTC  

there things like least harm to someone is moral or least going against wills or least suffering

2019-11-21 18:05:07 UTC  

Examples?

2019-11-21 18:05:13 UTC  

choose one and they all give different moralitys

2019-11-21 18:05:37 UTC  

least total sum of suffering is leading to scary morality

2019-11-21 18:05:46 UTC  

Which morals are objective? @Timebomb

2019-11-21 18:06:11 UTC  

ah right try to read 3 worlds

2019-11-21 18:06:17 UTC  

I think morality is based upon the well-being if others

2019-11-21 18:06:19 UTC  

its basically about leat suffering morality

2019-11-21 18:06:33 UTC  

again u think emaning its subjective

2019-11-21 18:06:42 UTC  

u set the starting point subjective

2019-11-21 18:06:52 UTC  

building on it u can try objective sure

2019-11-21 18:06:57 UTC  

What?

2019-11-21 18:06:59 UTC  

but the starting point

2019-11-21 18:07:03 UTC  

is not

2019-11-21 18:07:19 UTC  

If two people subjectively agree the well-being of others is important, they now have an objective lens to view events through

2019-11-21 18:07:24 UTC  

I hope that makes sense

2019-11-21 18:07:29 UTC  

yes

2019-11-21 18:07:42 UTC  

I disagree

2019-11-21 18:08:01 UTC  

It would still be subjective to those two people

2019-11-21 18:08:14 UTC  

It would be

2019-11-21 18:08:16 UTC  

It's like saying if two robbers agree to rob someone, it is morally alright to them