Message from @RandomDiscordAccount
Discord ID: 638628164574380043
You mean Natufian rape babies?
or their bantu slaves?
or the arab trading states?
lol
ugh always an excuse
thats not an excuse
the british went to war with these people and guess what ethnicity they were?
East Africans, Southern Arabs and bantus as the lowest classes
the caliphate of omar basically owned that land
wait, might have the wrong name
hold up
Sultanate of Oman is what you're looking for
But yeah you're right
@English Pirate yes
thank you
alright even if supposedly natufians were in every society it doesn't mean that their genetics were directly responsible for all of it.
@Fidel Castro no one is saying every society, just the civilized african ones
i said 'even if'
like this is easy bro, just check if they spoke Niger Congo linear A, Niger Congo Linear B or an Afro-Asiatic language
the majority of them are Afro-asiatic and that isnt just by chance
aha what about hungary
and even then it was mostly a trade empire
what about hungary?
hungarian language is not afro-asiatic
no shit
its turkic
Uralic
But ye
yup ^
i always forget when it comes to Hungary
uralic people need to pick indo-european or turkic
theyre like the barely noticeable person that sits in the back
well hungary had civilization despite not speaking afro-asiatic. Plus hungarans weren't very ethnically different from others in the area
@Fidel Castro why dont you understand?
were not saying all civilizations are from the natufians, just that all the african civilizations of any notability are
sorry if i'm misunderstanding you
Europe is predominately indo-european due to the yamnaya expansion
>all african civilizations of any notability
mali empire tho
i used the term notability for a reason
it was notable