Message from @Verm
Discord ID: 277823999738773505
@D3VNT I'm a Keynesian, but out side of basic things I believe government intervention should be minimal
Well you and I agree on minimalism
directing business and trade towards a healthy area is good, and supporting businesses during hard times, especially ones that are generally responsible and stable
the government should be involved in in most parts of media, if only to keep kikes out @D3VNT
Bert
Ernie
Bernie
kek
oh shit
But what about when your government becomes kikes
Our children are indoctrinated to vote for bernie
he can still win guys!
I think the government should primarily do its best to increase efficiency through roads, police, hospitals, removing degeneracy, etc
then you're fucked, and need a Godsend like Trump to run for office
But does NatSoc take the socialist concept of the state owning means of production?
not necessarily
Or is that strictly a marxist thing
the memes of production
I find the socialism in NatSoc to be misleading
It says there quite clearly
marxists want us to fuck around in small tribes of cavepeople and shit
So when I think of NatSoc I literally think of Bernie
not even joking
NatSoc generally is anti Marxist and anti capitalist
^
How does one be anti-capitalist and not encroach on gobbunism
@D3VNT Well the economy is geared towards national goals, while private ownership is protected
Ah, gotcha
I can actually see the merit in that
Just not my cup of tea
Because your have leaders in charge that decide who deserves to do business
I feel like in a perfect world, rather than have pure natsoc the government should employ capitalism as a means of generating more capital for its socialist aspects like welfare for expectant mothers
The government is free to intervene within the economy, such as quotas, etc
like Trump is doing in a roundabout way
I hope Justice Ginsburg dies soon and Trump picks Judge William Pryor to replace her just to piss the Liberals off.
I personally am not a NatSoc, but I see the benefits
To illustrate my trepidation thereof, I point to China
>capitalizing "liberals"