who's gonna stop them?

@Deleted User
>"hot"
¬_¬

@EuropeanDerg oh <:GWqlabsKek:393085130219978752>

@Deleted User also it's okay to be a masochist :3

well it's not my cup of tea but sure, whatever floats your boat

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

@Deleted User lol not my fetish tho

i don't judge

i think its wierd but i have no principled reason why i could stop someone else from voluntarily hurting themselves (using the law anyway) so... i guess

except all the judging i do

@Deleted User lmao :P

not bad its sort of what i expected from what i've read of your posts so far

I hope nobody is in those top two squares or else i'm gonna.... voice objections they have a right to ignoe

oh

i'm gonna try it

so censoring isis propaganda etc?

Among some yes

i put a half thumbs down to that. Like there are some ideas that shouldnt be out there

like how to build a nuclear bomb or something idk

Any one interested in debating libertarian vs fascism?????

even if you dont have the resources

oof i have no idea

is this like "in principle" or pragmatic?

PATRIOT act

like, ideally i wouldn't want surveillance anywhere

buuuut, we do have terrorists sooo

i guess some surveillance could help

but then again how many terrorists are using whatsapp etc?

but surveillance isn't just limited to that

fuck

i'll just sit in the middle on that

there should be an option to skip a question

https://youtu.be/FzfavtkjaPw

what does that mean?

@Deleted User Jury nullification

Like, marijuana laws for example

"Yeah, he had weed on him, which is illegal. But it's a dumb law"